Monday, March 22, 2010

NJ House Healthcare Traitors

It was a short time ago that this Rutgers-Eagleton poll was released. Two interesting statistics that came out of the poll were that while 88 percent of respondents felt that change was needed, 70 percent thought that the congress needed to start over(ie that this legislation would not solve the problem). This poll was conducted right here in New Jersey and should have been instructive to our state House of Representatives members.

But alas only one Democrat (John Adler NJ-3) and all Republicans thought that they should pay any attention to what New Jersey voters think. Come election time, remember the following Democrat Non-Representatives:

Robert Andrews NJ-1
Rush Holt NJ-12
Frank Pallone NJ-6
Bill Pascrell NJ-8
Donald Payne NJ-10
Steven Rothman NJ-9
Albio Sires NJ-13


Each of these people decided that Nancy Pelosi was more important that the voters of the State of New Jersey. And they cannot say they didn't know. Adler clearly got the message he resisted all summer and deserves some credit for that. I hope each of the rest of these NON-representatives soon get to know this new healthcare world they will enjoy as FORMER members of the House.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Tuesday, February 2, 2010

When they tell you how great Canadian healthcare is....

Just refer to this (From this in National Post):


Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams is to have heart surgery in the United States later this week, a press conference this morning is expected to confirm.

Media reports last night suggested the popular 59-year-old Premier has opted not to remain in his home province or country for the scheduled surgery, opting instead for treatment at a U.S. institution. The exact destination is not known.


If Democrats succeed in destroying healthcare in the United States, where will we go?

Add to Technorati Favorites

Labels: , ,


Tuesday, December 22, 2009

The Healthcare Gravy Train: Why is NJ getting nothing?

The bribes paid to recalcitrant Democrat legislators have been documented in various blogs on both the left and right. The so-called 'Cash for Cloture' scandal can be reviewed in detail here at Michelle Malkin's site. No reasonable citizen can look at this situation and the actions by Harry Reid and not be sickened by the Senate Majority Leader using taxpayer money to bribe senators in his own caucus to support a bill that over 60 percent of Americans are against.

But my cynical side wonders where our two senators are hiding throughout this process. Menendez and Lautenberg are such comfortable votes for the Democrats that they have no leverage to get anything for the State of New Jersey's citizens. They continue to excel in their combined 30 year losing streak on behalf of our state. But hey, at least Nebraska citizens won't have to worry about their healthcare costs.


Add to Technorati Favorites

Labels: , , , , ,


Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Healthcare: Alternative ideas but the White House and Democrats aren't listening!

Whenever you read in the paper that Republicans are obstructionists and the people are just complaining at town hall events, there is a common thread in the story. And it is that no one is offerring alternative ideas to the load of garbage being put forward by House Democrats and the White House. The sad thing is that there are a lot of ideas suggested to fix both the cost and the coverage aspects of healthcare that our current crop of politicians absolutely refuse to comprehend.

And all while Obama insists on demonizing insurers. The unfortunate thing is that the industry is far from healthy and is hurting in a major way. In my business, we work with all kinds of organizations and the insurance companies have been shedding employees for the past 5 years. They are not making massive profits. As a matter of fact, if you graph Barack Obama's and Chris Dodd's last eight years revenue against individual companies in the insurance industry, you will find that both Obama and Dodd fared far better in terms of growing their revennue base. The insurance industry in fact makes less than 1 penny for every dollar in premium received (Forrester research).

We have the Obama and Democrat narrative:

- Insurance companies are evil and healthcare unions are good
- Companies that provide insurance are bad and government providing insurance is good
- Competition is bad when private companies do it, good when the government fixes it
- People that speak at town halls are astroturf while union thugs beating them up are good
- Anyone questioning Democrats is fake while paid protestors are good
- Old people are bad but illegal immigrants are good
- Doctors are bad but Tort lawyers are good

It's no wonder people are fed up.

Here are some ideas that will never find their way into the debate despited being offerred up by Republicans, the insurance industry and free market advocates:

Controlling cost and adding flexibility

1. Insurance Portability. Make it a requirement that all insurance it portable. If every firm needs to accept the rule, it will be so. The insurance industry has already agreed to do this early into the debate.
2. Tort Reform. I know I know. The Democrats need to protect poor Dicky Scruggs so that he can own ten airplanes while filing bs lawsuits against doctors, hospitals and pharmaceutical firms. But you cannot control costs without addressing frivilous lawsuits.
3. Drop interstate limitations on competition for insurance. Right now we have 50 different states plus the Federal government regulating insurance and blocking competition. Remove these barriers and then maybe Joe Smith in New York will stop paying 5 times what Jim Smith in Tennessee is paying.
4. Have a discussion about moving the responsibility for insurance from the employer to the employee. And help provide a transition from the business entity which will gain long term in cost control to the employee. Then the employee will be free to take advantage of the increased competition to buy the kind of coverage that will be optimal for their family.
5. Health savings accounts. Cash is king even in the healthcare marketplace. Remove the requirement to submit claims for insurance completely and the doctor can perform certain care much more efficiently and cost effectively.
6. Eliminate government based care and hospital mandates so that the private sector can stop underwriting goverment programs and citizens are not paying twice for the same thing. For example, we all pay for medicare at both the state and federal level. Then the goverment only pays the hospital 5 dollars for a 20 dollar procedure. Who pays the rest? We do through private insurance as we will get charged 35 dollars to make up for it. This is goverment competition and is contributing to our current damaged system. Obama and Democrats just don't talk about it.
7. A national fraud database to track both doctors patients who abuse the system and real penalties when they are caught.

Once costs are brought under control, we can have the discussion about insuring the 12 million people who legitimately may need assistance. Not the illegal aliens. Not people who can afford insurance but choose to keep their money in their pocket. And not the fictitious people who cannot get insurance until you really investigate their story and find out they really do have coverage.

All of these things would add to the debate but you will never hear them proposed. Why? Because they don't add power to the unions and Democrats in congress.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Wednesday, June 24, 2009

NY Times Healthcare Poll - Fake, Phony and Fraud

When I saw the New York Times Healthcare poll the other day that claimed that there was massive support for Obama's healthcare plan, I was surprised becauase the poll didn't seem to fit with the number of people who were "happy" with their current plans and doctors. Apparently, the fix was in (from CNSNews):

A New York Times/CBS News poll released Saturday that showed broad bipartisan support for President Obama’s health care reform, over-sampled Obama voters compared to McCain voters, critics say.

The poll, administered June 12-16, found that 72 percent of respondents favored the creation of a government health-insurance plan that would compete with private insurers.


I have long been suspect of anything that is labelled to be fair form either CBS or the New York Times. But this is outright manipulation of data - propoganda to benefit the Obama agenda. But the facts don't match the poll. And the media is trying to ram healthcare reform down our throats.

“We are identical to where we were in 1993-94,” she told CNSNews.com, “with only 51 percent of respondents even in the Democrat-skewing poll saying the health-care system needs fundamental changes, versus 52 percent in January 1994. When the question becomes whether the system needs to be completely rebuilt, 34 percent say yes in the NYT/CBS poll, versus 38 percent in 1994.

Additionally, the vast majority of Americans are satisfied with their own insurance coverage, as they were at the beginning of the Clinton administration. Approximately 77 percent in the current poll say they are at least somewhat satisfied.


Read the entire article here.

It's real hope and change you can believe in. Except its fake.
Add to Technorati Favorites

Labels: , , ,