For Whom Was The Term "Imperial Presidency" Coined, Again?

Posted on 22 March 2010

Got an email from Barack Obama today. It says, in part (boldface in the original):

We have all been forced to ask if our politics had simply become too polarized and too short-sighted to meet the pressing challenges of our time. This struggle became a test of whether the American people could still rally together when the cause was right — and actually create the change we believe in.

Yeah. Because when every Republican votes against your bill, that’s not “too polarized”.

He talks as if the American people rallied together around this cause; as if this were change that most Americans believe in; as if most Americans weren’t against it.

This is the change that he believes in, perpetrated on us by a bunch of people with insufficient spine to stand up to Chicago politics.

It amazes me that people claimed that George Bush had an “Imperial Presidency”. This whole process has been such a staggering display of ego it’s hard to describe.

Add to Technorati Favorites


2 responses to For Whom Was The Term "Imperial Presidency" Coined, Again?

  • kyndall powell-hicks says:

    Arthur M. Schlesinger

  • Daniel says:

    great post, thanks for sharing

  • Leave a Response

    Recent Posts

    Tag Cloud

    2011 All Star Game 2011 Budget 2011 NJ Budget Atlas Shrugged Boehner Bush Tax Cuts Chicago Blackhawks Christie veto congressional primaries debt deal democrat Democrat hypocrisy Democrat lies on taxes Flyers Greenwald Heritage foundation analysis intolerance liberal lookup tea party events mayor MLB nj budget nj democrats NJEA NJ Tea Party obamacare political ignorance primary day Rei rob parisi school budget school budgets Schumer socialism Stanley Cup state spending susan mccartney taxes tea party Tea Party Patriots town council trentonian Venezuela vic cirilo west orange

    Meta

    NJ Tax Revolution is proudly powered by WordPress and the SubtleFlux theme.

    Copyright © NJ Tax Revolution