Earmarks vs Porkulus

Posted on 12 February 2009

Barack Obama and congressional Democrats keep touting a canard that this wonderful stimulus bill they are ramming through is “completely free of earmarks”. Let’s examine that statement. The definition of an Earmark is as follows (from Wikipedia):

In US politics an earmark is a congressional provision that directs approved funds to be spent on specific projects or that directs specific exemptions from taxes or mandated fees.

Earmarks can be found both in legislation (also called “Hard earmarks” or “Hardmarks”) and in the text of Congressional committee reports (also called “Soft earmarks” or “Softmarks”). Hard earmarks are binding and have the effect of law, while soft earmarks do not have the effect of law but by custom are acted on as if they were binding.[1] Typically, a legislator seeks to insert earmarks that direct a specified amount of money to a particular organization or project in his/her home state or district.

So if we parse the words, to be an earmark it should:

a. the direction of funds in a bill
b. be inserted by a senator or member of congress
c. to benefit their states or districts financially

I have reviewed the drafts of pieces of this legislation and the summaries. I would estimate that more than half of this entire bill is an earmark. Just because the spending size is so large that multiple senators and members of congress are taking home the loot, doesn’t negate it fact that it is for an earmark.

Some favorites rumored to be in the final legislation:

- LA to Vegas train (Reid)
- $30 million dollars in wetlands preservation for San Fran (Pelosi)
- $200 million dollar power plan in IL (Obama)
- Major funds for building govt building projects in Maryland, Virginia and Georgia
- 80 billion for outright payments for state who have through their out of control spending are in financial trouble (see California, New York, Michigan and New Jersey)
- 6.5 billion for National Institute of Health as a buyout for Republic Arlen Specter

If it looks like an earmark, costs like an earmark, is hidden into legislation like and earmark with no attribution….it’s an earmark.

Add to Technorati Favorites


Category: American Recovery and Reinvestment Bill, Barack Obama, Democrat hypocrisy, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, porkulus, stimulus package, wasted spending

No responses yet. You could be the first!

Leave a Response

Recent Posts

Tag Cloud

2011 All Star Game 2011 Budget 2011 NJ Budget Atlas Shrugged Boehner Bush Tax Cuts Chicago Blackhawks Christie veto congressional primaries debt deal democrat Democrat hypocrisy Democrat lies on taxes Flyers Greenwald Heritage foundation analysis intolerance liberal lookup tea party events mayor MLB nj budget nj democrats NJEA NJ Tea Party obamacare political ignorance primary day Rei rob parisi school budget school budgets Schumer socialism Stanley Cup state spending susan mccartney taxes tea party Tea Party Patriots town council trentonian Venezuela vic cirilo west orange

Meta

NJ Tax Revolution is proudly powered by WordPress and the SubtleFlux theme.

Copyright © NJ Tax Revolution